“Natural” Gas Pipeline Controversy Comes to NH

Driving through the towns just below the Massachusetts/New Hampshire border, one sees a lot of signs these days.

stop the pipeline photo 1

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, a subsidiary of Texas-based Kinder Morgan, wants to build a pipeline to carry fracked natural gas (NG) across the northern edge of Massachusetts from Richmond, on the New York border, to an existing NG hub in Dracut, MA, roughly 13 miles southeast of Nashua, NH. There it would join an existing network of pipelines taking much of that gas northward to Canada. The capacity of this pipeline would be nearly four

times that required to overcome any shortages experienced during winter periods of peak demand.

Residents of towns along the Massachusetts-New Hampshire border were first alerted that something was up when representatives of Kinder Morgan came knocking on their doors, asking whether KM could survey their properties by drilling to find what is under the topsoil.

Why Canada?

NG can be sold in Europe for two to three times the U.S. market price and in Asia for three to four times the U.S. price. Under North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), exporting to Canada does not carry the restrictions that apply to export to non-free-trade countries. The reason for the rush to build pipelines to Canada is to get the gas where it can more easily be sold abroad for more money.

The New Hampshire Connection

Liberty Utilities, a subsidiary of Canadian energy giant Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp., would like to see a spur line from Massachusetts to a yet-to-be-constructed hub in Merrimack, NH. The route originally proposed would pass directly through conservation land of Hollis’ Beaver Brook Association, a popular land trust.

In an effort to preserve land which had been donated or purchased with monetary gifts, Beaver Brook Association hired an engineer to come up with alternative routes for the pipeline. One of those alternatives would still pass through the town of Hollis, but would avoids the conservation land; two would pass through adjacent Brookline, NH. Both towns are now joining their Massachusetts neighbors in a fight to stop these pipelines altogether.townsent march

Land owner concerns and options

Residents along the proposed routes question if there’s any real need for the added capacity the pipeline would provide. They resent the intrusion into their towns. They question the ethics of having to pay for pipelines through a surcharge on their electric bill. They are concerned about Kinder Morgan’s safety record. The gas passing through the pipeline would not have been purified, and would contain residues of chemicals used in the fracking process. It would not have had an odorant added to aid in leak detection.

Some residents have found that allowing an energy pipeline to pass through their property would violate the terms of their mortgage. Some have been told that, if the pipeline goes through their property, or even if their land abuts property traversed by a pipeline, their homeowner’s insurance would be canceled.

Landowners are faced with a limited number of choices. The final pipeline siting decision will be made by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Once a FERC permit has been granted, their land can be taken through eminent domain.

Nearly 30 towns have united to oppose the construction of these lines. That’s the reason for the signs, and for a rolling protest moving from west to east in Massachusetts, ending with the presentation of a petition to Massachusetts’ Governor Patrick on July 30.

Deeper Environmental Concerns

The proposed pipelines ignore our need to get away from producing and burning fossil fuels. Natural gas is primarily methane, a greenhouse gas over 80 times more powerful than CO2 in the short term, over 20 times more in the long term. Studies show that, when a full accounting of methane’s impact on the environment is taken into account, fracked natural gas has no benefit over coal or oil in reducing greenhouse gas effects. Building the proposed pipelines would involve an enormous investment, only to postpone the inevitable need to transition to sustainable energy sources.

To support your neighbors and our environment, contact your Governor and your state representatives, and join the upcoming rallies.

For info:

In Brookline, NH, contact:

In Hollis, NH, contact:


NH Pipeline Awareness here

No Fracked Gas in Massachusetts here

Nashoba Trust here

Follow the rolling protest here


350NH Joins Grassroots coalition to Keep NH Tar Sands Free

1017132023a Members of 350NH joined on October 17th with members and friends of NH Audubon, National Wildlife Federation,, and others to plan several campaigns opposing any Tar Sands presence in New Hampshire.

Our group first discussed a campaign to place a Tar Sands Free Resolution on the agendas for the Annual Town Meetings that occur in many NH towns. Carol Foss presented a draft resolution which could be tailored to suit individual towns. Details regarding the process for getting a warrant article on the Town Meeting agenda were reviewed. During the actual Town Meetings in March, individuals would need to make a brief presentation about the warrant article. This would be followed by general discussion and comments, and then voted on by the registered voters who were attending the Town meeting.

We then moved on to discuss plans for a series of “teach-ins” to be held on college campuses, that would bring together interested college students and members of the surrounding communities. Katie T. from UNH provided the student’s perspective, which helped decide on a tentative start date (the beginning of second semester in late January). She suggested a format of a week-night, 2.5 hour event, with 3-4 speakers on different aspects of the Tar Sands situation in NH. We agreed on a primary goal of having diversity of speakers (e.g. a student, an older voice, an Indigenous person affected by Tar Sands).

Katie informed us about the PowerShift meeting occuring in Pittsburgh PA the weekend of Oct. 19-20. Several UNH students plan to attend to learn, brainstorm, and organize with students from many states. David Stember expressed the possibility that UNH students might do much of the organizing for the campus-based teach-ins.

Before the meeting ended, we briefly discussed other ways to inform NH residents about the proposed Tar Sands pipeline that would run through Northern NH. Ideas included posters, stickers, lawn signs, a big press event, letters to the editor (especially around 4 bills being proposed at the State House). The meeting concluded with a sense of urgency and determination. There is a lot of work to do to bring the plans to fruition. Working together as a coalition of organizations concerned about New Hampshire’s environment, we can get so much accomplished!